ChatGPT’s o3 model was given data and an analytical framework to assess the potential black-swan fallout of a nuclear conflict on the global cryptocurrency ecosystem amid rising tensions between Israel and Iran over nuclear weapons concerns.
The model’s core scenarios included both a wide-scale nuclear war and a more localized, tactical nuclear strike, which o3 suggests could immediately disrupt regional exchanges, nodes, and fiat on-ramps wherever the strike occurs.
New AI Model Warns of Crypto Chaos in Nuclear Conflict Scenarios
In a more severe scenario of widespread nuclear exchange, o3 warns that global internet backbones could be knocked out by electromagnetic pulses (EMPs), forcing transactions to rely on offline relays and satellite fallback systems.
These projected disruptions are juxtaposed with real-time market moves observed during the recent Israel-Iran airstrikes.
On June 12, for example, explosions in Tehran triggered a sharp reaction in crypto markets. Bitcoin fell by over 4% in 24 hours, from $106,042 to $103,053, before stabilizing near $104,370, data from CoinMarketCap shows.
The total crypto market cap shed 3%, with Ethereum and Solana off about 7% and Dogecoin down 6%.
In the same 24-hour window, a massive crypto liquidation cascade destroyed over $1.16 billion in leveraged positions. It marked one of the most brutal trading days for crypto in recent months.
As investors fled to traditional safe havens like gold and oil, crypto and other risk assets sold off aggressively. The scale and speed of the decline validated the AI model’s central thesis: that digital assets remain acutely sensitive to psychological and liquidity shocks during periods of extreme geopolitical risk.
From Disruption to Breakdown: How Tactical and Full-Scale Attacks Could Disrupt Blockchain
In the case of a limited tactical nuclear strike, o3 noted that, “While regional exchanges, mining facilities, and fiat on-ramps could suffer outages, the global nature of blockchain infrastructure would help preserve core network functionality.”
However, the psychological impact alone would likely be enough to trigger a rapid 15-30% decline across major crypto assets, worsened by panic-driven sell-offs and cascading liquidations.
Short-term disruptions would be followed by a stabilization period, which depends on the extent of the physical and economic fallout.
In contrast, o3 predicts that “a full-scale nuclear exchange, particularly one involving electromagnetic pulses (EMPs), poses a far more existential threat. EMPs have the potential to knock out large swaths of the internet and global power infrastructure.”
In such a scenario, blockchain continuity would depend on the availability of satellite relays, off-grid nodes, and fallback communication methods, o3 wrote. While consensus mechanisms may technically survive in isolated zones, transaction delays, ledger fragmentation, and severe network degradation would be likely outcomes.
In both scenarios, Bitcoin and other proof-of-work (PoW) networks would face vulnerabilities due to their reliance on high-energy mining infrastructure, often concentrated in specific regions.
“Power outages or internet disruptions across key mining hubs could cripple network throughput and hash rate, leaving the system temporarily inoperable until redundancies are activated or grid power is restored,” o3 explained.
Nonetheless, the decentralized nature of these PoW systems offers a glimmer of hope: as long as some nodes remain operational, full recovery remains possible.
But proof-of-stake (PoS) networks like Ethereum may hold a structural advantage in such crises. These systems consume less power and have more geographically dispersed validators, improving their chances of maintaining uptime and consensus.
However, their dependence on oracles and off-chain data feeds introduces new vulnerabilities. If oracles fail, smart contracts across DeFi platforms could behave unpredictably, resulting in asset freezes, erroneous liquidations, and widespread liquidity failures.
Resilience by Design: Why Decentralized Architectures May Outlast Centralized Systems
Even more interesting, according to o3, systems built on decentralized architectures with built-in redundancy, such as satellite-linked nodes, solar-powered validators, and mesh relay networks, are more resilient than legacy exchanges or centralized finance platforms.
Among the most promising are DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) networks. Unlike traditional blockchains that build a single linear chain of blocks, DAG-based systems allow multiple chains or paths to progress simultaneously. This structure can allow higher throughput and greater flexibility in times of fragmentation or node isolation. Some key DAG and other decentralized networks include:
IOTA: Designed for the Internet of Things (IoT), IOTA uses a tangle-based DAG system where transactions validate each other. It eliminates miners entirely in exchange for lightweight, scalable infrastructure.
Fantom (Opera): A DAG-based smart contract platform built to handle high-speed transactions and low fees, often cited for its consensus mechanism (Lachesis) which allows asynchronous validation.
Nano: A lightweight, fee-less cryptocurrency using a block-lattice DAG structure, where each account has its own blockchain. Its design supports instant transactions with minimal energy usage.
Hedera Hashgraph: Though not a traditional DAG, Hedera uses a gossip-about-gossip protocol that enables high throughput and finality, popular among enterprise blockchain applications.
Aleph Zero: A privacy-enhancing DAG chain focused on both performance and zero-knowledge proofs, often referenced in discussions around next-generation Web3 security.
Alongside these, more conventional proof-of-stake (PoS) chains like Ethereum 2.0, Polkadot, and Cosmos also rate highly for their validator diversity and lower energy dependence, key factors if grid stability becomes an issue.
Meanwhile, stablecoins would likely face severe redemption pressure as fiat rails collapse and trust in issuer reserves erodes.
Memecoins and speculative tokens would also almost certainly collapse. Lacking infrastructure, utility, or robust community organization, these assets are expected to shed nearly all their value in the face of systemic crisis.
Conversely, privacy-focused cryptocurrencies such as Monero and Zcash could see a sudden surge in demand in a nuclear exchange.
These tokens, built for censorship resistance, may serve as essential financial tools for people evading capital controls or seeking anonymity in wartime conditions.
Crypto’s Real Test: Rising Inflows Clash with AI Warnings on Network Fragility
Despite the turmoil, some signs point to crypto’s resilience, especially in less widespread and dramatic scenarios. Bitcoin ETFs have seen five straight days of inflows, even as the regional Israel-Iran conflict escalated, for example.
Over $1.3 billion entered Bitcoin-linked funds in the past week, with $386 million flowing in on June 9 alone, according to Farside Investors.
Some industry voices see this as evidence that crypto remains attractive during geopolitical stress, though o3 indicates that, under worst-case scenarios, tech and financial infrastructure would be severely tested.
“Flight to safety” behavior is still present, though the crypto market has been treated largely as a risk asset in the initial stages of the conflict. In a more severe scenario with actual nuclear weapons involved, the outcome is hard to predict.
However, there is a widespread narrative that cryptocurrencies, particularly Bitcoin, may function as a hedge in times of global stress.
Despite this, o3 introduces a counterpoint to this bullish narrative. The AI suggests that in the immediate aftermath of such a nuclear disaster, all cryptocurrencies would likely suffer violent selloffs as investors retreat to cash and traditional safe havens.
Yet the model does not paint a uniformly bleak picture. As the initial chaos settles, functional differences between digital assets begin to matter. Cryptocurrencies capable of maintaining network integrity, either through decentralized validator sets, satellite node connectivity, or energy-efficient or more decentralized consensus mechanisms, may see relative recovery, especially in regions where traditional banking infrastructure has been degraded but internet access remains viable.
Bitcoin, according to the projection, might demonstrate a degree of price resilience over other assets. Its wider distribution, simpler consensus mechanics, and historical credibility lend it a higher chance of partial survival, even under severe strain.
In contrast, highly complex platforms or tokens reliant on off-chain services could falter amid infrastructure breakdowns and data feed disruptions.
Regional divergence would become pronounced in such a scenario. In jurisdictions where financial systems collapse but online access endures, operational cryptocurrencies could even begin to substitute as the de facto financial infrastructure.
Governments, meanwhile, would likely respond in disparate ways, creating a fragmented regulatory patchwork that influences which cryptocurrencies thrive or decline across different territories.
In the long-term reconstruction phase, the AI model anticipates a profound revaluation of the digital gold thesis. Gold, the traditional hedge, would likely outperform all cryptocurrencies during the crisis onset, o3 predicts. But if Bitcoin’s network remains intact in at least part of the world, its utility and symbolism could allow it to rebound faster, perhaps even reinforcing its status as a cornerstone of a new monetary paradigm.
The post AI Warns of Crypto Black Swan: Would Blockchains Survive Nuclear War? appeared first on Cryptonews.
